ExxonMobil to pay $9.5 million to resolve natural resources damages lawsuit


Acting Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin and Environmental Protection Commissioner Shawn M. LaTourette announced today that ExxonMobil will pay the state $9.5 million to resolve a resource damage lawsuit (NRD) against the company on behalf of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).

According to Platkin, the state’s 2019 lawsuit centered on dumping activities that took place on ExxonMobil’s more than 12-acre Lail property in East Greenwich Township and the Borough of Paulsboro.

The Lail property is in a tidal zone of the Delaware Estuary and is directly connected to Mantua Creek, which empties into the Delaware River.

In the late 1950s, Mobil Corp. used the Lail property to dispose of barrels full of petroleum products, polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) and other hazardous substances, dumping these industrial contaminants into area waterways and wetlands.

Platkin states that despite remediation activities at the site, inspections and testing leading up to the state’s lawsuit revealed that PCBs remained on and around the property, including in groundwater, the soil, wetlands, sediments and other sensitive ecological resources.

PCBs are organic chemicals that pose multiple health risks – including cancer – to animals and humans. Their manufacture was banned in 1979. The state alleged in its lawsuit that the main source of PCB contamination found on and around the Lail property was the former ExxonMobil refinery in Paulsboro, which produced the PCB-based pollutants. oil spilled there.

“This is an important outcome for New Jersey residents because it means state compensation for damage to our wetlands, waterways and other valuable natural resources,” the attorney general said in a statement. Interim Platkin. “When polluters treat some of our most pristine and sensitive areas as their own private disposal grounds, we hold them accountable.”

“With this action, the Murphy Administration continues to demonstrate its commitment to ensuring that the public receives just compensation for the damage that polluters have caused to our state’s precious natural resources, regardless of the duration of the pollution,” said said Commissioner LaTourette. “We will continue to fight for recoveries like this, which put money back into meaningful ecological restoration projects for our communities.”

According to NJ, according to the law, NRD is defined as damages for damage, destruction, loss or impairment of natural resources. DRLs generally include costs incurred by the state to assess damage and loss to specific natural resources.

Under the law, the state is trustee of all natural resources, including surface and ground water, sediments, wetlands, and biota (animal life) of New Jersey.

Among other claims, the state’s six-count lawsuit filed in March 2019 alleged violations by ExxonMobil of New Jersey’s Spill Compensation and Control Act, as well as the Spill Control Act. state water pollution.

The complaint also included allegations of trespassing, strict liability, tortious interference and creating a public nuisance.

The state’s NRD lawsuit noted that ExxonMobil’s environmental contractor reported detection of PCBs in the tissues of most small mammals collected during its study. The same report indicates that PCBs were detected in all locations where soil samples were taken and in the tissues of fish sampled as part of the study.

Barrels containing hazardous materials were removed from the Lail property in the mid-1990s, and additional remediation activities took place at the site between 2008 and 2010.

Remedial activity included the excavation and removal by ExxonMobil of approximately 86,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and sediment and backfilling of the excavation area to restore pre-excavation topographic conditions. ExxonMobil has also planted trees, shrubs and more than 6,000 aquatic plants on the property.

The consent judgment filed today does not address prior unpaid cleanup and removal costs related to Lail’s site. The consent judgment also notes that ExxonMobil and the State agree that no further active remedies are planned for the Lail site.

The ExxonMobil case was handled on behalf of the state by Deputy Attorney General Richard Engel, Deputy Attorney General Michael Spinello, and Deputy Attorney General Aaron Kleinbaum of the Law Enforcement and Environmental Justice (EEEJ) within the Law Division’s Affirmative Civil Enforcement Practice Group. .

Comments are closed.